Support via Patreon | Subscribe

Debunking the Crusades: 5 Myths You Probably Believe

Header Image for: Debunking the Crusades: 5 Myths You Probably Believe
Header Image: Deus Vult, God wills it, the battle cry of the First Crusade

The Crusades have long been a topic distorted by myth, legend, and misconception, especially in modern pop culture and film. Movies and television often portray the Crusaders as either valiant knights on holy missions or brutal barbarians bent on conquest, feeding into a skewed image of the events. These simplistic portrayals fail to capture the complex motivations and historical realities of the Crusades.

The Guardian article about the Reconciliation Walk

One striking example of how these misunderstandings have influenced modern perceptions was the so-called Reconciliation Walk in 1999, marking the 900th anniversary of the First Crusade. Hundreds of Christians walked from Germany to the Holy Land to apologise for the actions of their ancestors, with some wearing t-shirts that read “I apologize” in Arabic. While well-intentioned, the walk was unnecessary and based on a misreading of history. The actions of Crusaders, though often violent, must be understood in their medieval context — marked by political, religious, and social complexities that differ greatly from today’s values. Apologising for historical events centuries after the fact, particularly when based on simplistic views, overlooks these nuances and can reinforce myths rather than dispelling them.

Here are five common myths about the Crusades, along with the historical truth behind them:

 

Myth 1: The Crusades were an unprovoked attack by Christians on a peaceful Muslim world.

Truth:

While it’s true that the Crusades were initiated by the Latin Christian West, they were largely in response to Muslim expansion. By the time of the First Crusade in 1096, much of the Christian world had already been conquered by Muslim forces, including regions such as Syria, North Africa, and most of Spain. The Seljuk Turks’ advance into Byzantine territory (a Christian empire) and the capture of Jerusalem were major catalysts for Pope Urban II’s call to arms. The Crusades were framed as a defensive response, although not always executed with purely defensive motives.

Myth 2: The Crusades were primarily motivated by greed and the desire for land.

Truth:

While individual crusaders certainly had varied motivations, the majority did not join the Crusades for wealth or land. In fact, going on a Crusade was an incredibly costly and dangerous endeavour. Many crusaders were already landowners, and the journey to the Holy Land often left them financially depleted. The promise of spiritual rewards, such as indulgences (the remission of sins), played a much more significant role in motivating participants. The Crusades were seen as acts of piety, albeit often misguided.

Myth 3: The Crusaders were merciless barbarians who indiscriminately slaughtered innocent Muslims, Jews, and Christians.

Truth:

While the Crusades were brutal, and there were certainly episodes of horrific violence, such as the sack of Jerusalem in 1099, it is an oversimplification to paint all Crusaders as bloodthirsty. At times, crusading armies negotiated with Muslim leaders, such as Saladin, who famously retook Jerusalem in 1187 but allowed Christians to leave the city unharmed. Moreover, Christian pilgrims, merchants, and even soldiers often lived and traded peacefully with Muslim and Jewish communities in the Crusader States. The violence of the Crusades must be understood in the broader context of medieval warfare, which was brutal across all societies.

Myth 4: The Crusades were a total failure.

Truth:

While the ultimate goal of securing Christian control over Jerusalem and other holy sites was not achieved in the long term, the Crusades were not an absolute failure. The Crusaders managed to establish several states in the Levant that lasted for nearly two centuries, such as the Kingdom of Jerusalem. These states facilitated cultural and economic exchanges between the West and the Muslim world. Additionally, the Crusades had long-lasting political and social effects in Europe, strengthening papal authority and prompting new developments in trade and military techniques.

Myth 5: The Crusades were purely religious conflicts.

Truth:

Although the Crusades were launched with religious motivations — specifically, the desire to reclaim holy sites for Christianity — religion was only one factor. The Crusades also had political, economic, and social dimensions. European rulers saw opportunities for expanding their influence, while the papacy sought to strengthen its authority over Christendom. Furthermore, the Crusades spurred trade between East and West, opening new routes and markets. The interaction between Christian and Muslim worlds, though often hostile, led to significant cultural exchanges in science, philosophy, and art.

The Crusades were complex events that cannot be reduced to simple narratives of good versus evil, greed, or religious fanaticism. While there were indeed elements of violence, mismanagement, and greed, many participants were driven by deep spiritual convictions. Likewise, the Crusades were not a monolithic war between Christians and Muslims; they involved a wide array of political, social, and economic factors that reshaped both Europe and the Middle East. Overly simplistic views, such as those behind the 1999 Reconciliation Walk, can obscure the true nature of these historical events and reinforce myths, rather than promoting genuine understanding.

 

Further Reading

  • Madden, Thomas F. The New Concise History of the Crusades. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.
    • A comprehensive, balanced overview of the Crusades, covering their causes, events, and impact on both Christian and Muslim worlds.
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan. The Crusades: A History. Yale University Press, 2005.
    • An essential text by one of the leading historians of the Crusades, offering detailed analysis of the religious, political, and cultural motivations behind them.
  • Asbridge, Thomas. The Crusades: The Authoritative History of the War for the Holy Land. Ecco, 2011.
    • This book presents an in-depth, accessible narrative of the Crusades, drawing on both Christian and Muslim sources.
  • Tyerman, Christopher. God’s War: A New History of the Crusades. Penguin, 2006.
    • A thorough and scholarly examination of the Crusades, focusing on the complex interactions between Europe and the Near East.
  • France, John. The Crusades and the Expansion of Catholic Christendom, 1000–1714. Routledge, 2005.
    • This text offers a broader view of the Crusades within the context of medieval Christendom and the expansion of the Catholic Church’s influence.
Leave a comment   Like   Back to Top   Seen 559 times   Liked 0 times

Contribute on Patreon

Enjoying this? Consider contributing regular gifts for this content on Patreon.
* Patreon is a way to join your favorite creator's community and pay them for making the stuff you love. You can simply pay a few pounds per month or per post that a creator makes, and in return receive some perks!

Subscribe to Updates
My new book is out now! Order today wherever you get books

Subscribe to:

Have something to say? Leave a comment below.

x

Subscribe to Updates

If you enjoyed this, why not subscribe to free email updates and join over 827 subscribers today!

My new book is out now! Order today wherever you get books

Subscribe to Blog updates



Subscribe to:

Alternatively, you can subscribe via RSS RSS

‹ Return to Blog

All email subscriptions must be confirmed to comply with GDPR.

I've already subscribed / don't show me this again

Recent Posts

Doubting Defying Jihad: Questioning the Popular Conversion Story

| 12th March 2025 | Islam

Doubting Defying Jihad: Questioning the Popular Conversion Story

This is a guest post by “KingsServant” In 2019 a book called Defying Jihad was published by Tyndale House, the reputable Christian publisher telling the story of “Esther Ahmad” a pseudonym used by the author alongside her co-author Craig Borlase, who has previously written alongside, well known Christian personalities such as Matt Redman the singer and Andrew Brunson, an American pastor imprisoned by the Turkish government. As I began to read this book over this past year I was expecting an encouraging account of how a former Jihadi found Christ and escaped her previous accomplices. Very quickly, however, I became uncomfortable, her descriptions of her background involved allegedly committed Muslims doing very un-Islamic things and the unnamed militant group doing unusual things that didn’t fit my knowledge gained from years of study of Islam and interactions with Muslims, including extremists. As my doubts about the authenticity of the book solidified, and yet I couldn’t find anyone else who had questioned these things before me, or on the other hand provided verification of her story. I decided to contact Craig. During our brief and cordial email exchange he told me that he had been in touch with people who knew Esther after she escaped her family home, but so far has not suggested he has any other lines of evidence confirming any of the key elements of her account before that time. As a result, I am writing this article to draw attention to the aspects that raise suspicion. According to “Esther’s” story, she was raised in Pakistan where she was sent to an extremist madrassa (or Muslim school) for girls, there they were shown images of victims of violence and told that Christians and Jews were responsible - the emphasis on Jews and particularly Christians by a militant group based in Pakistan is strange. All the terrorist groups in Pakistan direct their efforts towards Hindus (especially in Kashmir) or other Muslims, since Christians are such a tiny minority there. Things rapidly become even stranger when a Mullah displays weapons to the group of girls telling them “… one day you will get to handle these” as the book continues describing them being encouraged to aspire to physical violence towards Jews and Christians specifically, the description of “Aunt Selma” volunteering for and dying fighting Jihad is likewise out of place. Islamic terrorist groups very rarely recruit women for combat roles, as Devorah Margolin describes Hamas and ISIS as departing from convention by encouraging female participation in violence and even then in only a very restricted way under particular circumstances with a specific fatwa (or Islamic ruling) being issued.1 On page 33, the militant group leader “Anwar” suggests that Esther could find a husband in the west to bring him to Islam. It is strictly forbidden for a Muslim woman to marry a non Muslim man, the idea that they would be encouraged by a scholar to date is about as unbelievable. In a conservative Pakistani culture, she would more likely find herself the victim of a so-called “honour killing” for such a thing.2 After her initial chance encounters with her future husband “John” (not as a result of trying to follow “Anwar’s” advice), on page 92 it is recorded that he said to her “… I’m not against your faith and beliefs…”, it’s the kind of thing that we might expect a liberal in the west to say, but not a Pakistani believer who knows that Islam denies that Jesus is the Son of God and that he died for sinners. Following her conversion according to her account, she engaged in a number of public debates with clerics in which she defended her decision to leave Islam and follow Christ. It is not uncommon for apostates to have meetings with scholars arranged by their family members in the hope that they might be won back to Islam, but it is very surprising that her influential father would want to give his apostate daughter su...

From Dust to Redemption: The Meaning of Ash Wednesday

| 05th March 2025 | Lent

From Dust to Redemption: The Meaning of Ash Wednesday

Ash Wednesday marks the beginning of Lent, a season of repentance, fasting, and preparation for Easter in the Christian calendar. It is observed by many Western Christian traditions, including the Roman Catholic Church, Anglican Communion, Lutheran churches, and some Methodist and Reformed communities. The day falls 46 days before Easter Sunday and is always on a Wednesday. Origins and Historical Development The practice of Ash Wednesday can be traced back to the early centuries of Christianity, though its formal observance developed over time. The use of ashes as a sign of repentance has deep biblical roots, appearing frequently in the Old Testament. People would cover themselves with ashes as an outward sign of sorrow for sin and a desire to turn back to God (e.g., Job 42:6, Daniel 9:3, Jonah 3:6). By the 8th century, the imposition of ashes on the forehead became a common practice in the Western Church. Pope Urban II (r. 1088–1099) helped formalise Ash Wednesday as the official beginning of Lent, reinforcing the idea of a season of penitence leading up to Easter. The name “Ash Wednesday” itself comes from the tradition of marking the faithful with ashes, typically in the shape of a cross, while the priest or minister recites words such as, “Remember that you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Genesis 3:19) or “Repent, and believe in the Gospel” (Mark 1:15). The Lenten Fast Fasting has always been a central aspect of Lent, and by the time of the Council of Nicaea (AD 325), a forty-day period of fasting before Easter had become a standard part of Church practice. This was based on the example of Jesus’ forty days in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1–2) and was intended to prepare believers spiritually for the Passion and Resurrection of Christ. Athanasius, the great bishop of Alexandria, regularly wrote paschal (Easter) letters to the churches to encourage fasting, self-control, and moderation during this period. His writings provide valuable insight into how Lent was observed in the early Church and confirm that the practice was well established long before later claims that it had pagan origins. In one of his letters, written around AD 332, he describes the structure of the Lenten fast: The beginning of the fast of forty days is on the fifth of the month Phamenoth [Ash Wednesday]; and when, as I have said, we have first been purified and prepared by those days, we begin the holy week of the great Easter on the tenth of the month Pharmuthi [Palm Sunday], in which, my beloved brethren, we should use more prolonged prayers, and fastings… — Athanasius, Letter III (c. AD 332) The early Lenten fast was stricter than modern observances. Many early Christians abstained not only from meat but also from dairy, eggs, and wine. In some traditions, believers ate only one meal per day, typically in the evening. While practices have evolved over time, the principle remains the same: Lent is a time of self-discipline, spiritual renewal, and preparation for Easter. Meaning and Observance of Ash Wednesday Ash Wednesday serves as a solemn reminder of human mortality and the need for repentance. The ashes, often made by burning the palm branches from the previous year’s Palm Sunday, symbolise both death and the hope of renewal in Christ. The day is also marked by fasting and abstinence in many traditions, such as within Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, the faithful are required to fast and to abstain from meat and dairy on various days. Many other denominations encourage similar practices or personal acts of self-denial as a way of focusing on spiritual growth. Churches hold special services where worshippers receive the imposition of ashes. The act is not merely ritualistic but is meant to be a public declaration of one’s commitment to turn away from sin and seek God’s grace. Greek Orthodox Yearly Fasting Calendar (2025). Fasting isn’t just for Lent! An Anglican Perspective The Ch...

Biblical Inspiration and the Canon: How We Got the Bible

| 28th February 2025 | Early Church

Biblical Inspiration and the Canon: How We Got the Bible

The Bible is often described as “God-breathed,” a phrase taken from 2 Timothy 3:16: “All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.” But what does it mean for Scripture to be “inspired,” and how did the books of the Bible come to be recognised as part of the canon — the authoritative collection of writings that make up the Bible? Were they really “decided” at the Council of Nicaea, as some popular myths claim? Table of Contents Understanding Biblical Inspiration What is the Canon? The Septuagint and the Deuterocanonical Books How Were the Books of the Bible Selected? Why Were Some Books Excluded? Has the Bible Been Edited or Corrupted Over Time? Did the Church Decide the Canon at Nicaea? Conclusion Further Reading Understanding Biblical Inspiration A helpful analogy for inspiration is that of an architect designing a great building. Consider St. Paul’s Cathedral in London — Christopher Wren was the architect who planned and designed it, yet he himself did not lay a single brick. Instead, countless workers followed his design to bring the cathedral into existence. Similarly, God is the ultimate author of Scripture, yet He worked through human writers to bring His message to us. The Holy Spirit inspired them, guiding their words while allowing their personalities, historical context, and literary style to remain evident in their writings. This means that while the Bible is written by human hands, it carries divine authority because its true source is God Himself. The process of inspiration does not mean God dictated each word like a secretary taking notes, or by possessing the authors, but rather that He ensured the truth of His message was faithfully recorded by the biblical writers. What is the Canon? The word “canon” comes from the Greek κανών (kanōn), meaning “rule” or “measuring rod.” In the context of the Bible, the canon refers to the official list of books recognised as divinely inspired and authoritative for faith and practice. The canon developed over time as the early church recognised which writings carried divine authority. The Old Testament canon was largely settled by the time of Jesus, based on the Hebrew Scriptures used in the Jewish community. The New Testament canon, however, was formed through a process of discernment over several centuries, as the church recognised which writings were truly inspired and authoritative. The Septuagint and the Deuterocanonical Books The Septuagint (LXX) is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, produced in the 3rd-2nd centuries BC. It was widely used by Greek-speaking Jews and later by early Christians, including the apostles. The Septuagint included several books not found in the Hebrew Bible, known as the Deuterocanonical books (such as Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, and 1–2 Maccabees). While these books were accepted in many early Christian communities and remain part of the canon in Catholic and Orthodox traditions, Protestant reformers later removed them, considering them useful but not divinely inspired at the same level as the rest of Scripture. The reformers’ view was influenced by Jerome, who, in the 4th century, argued that these books were not part of the Hebrew Bible and therefore should be considered separate. However, he still included them in his Latin Vulgate translation, recognising their historical and devotional value. The Reformers followed Jerome’s stance, moving these books into a separate section rather than outright removing them. It was not until the 19th century that an American Bible Society, citing printing costs and other practical considerations, physically removed these books entirely from Protestant Bibles. This decision solidified what is now commonly referred to as the “Protestant canon” of 66 books. And the other Books (as Hierome saith) the Church doth read for example o...

Announcing My New Book: What Really Happened at Nicaea?

| 23rd February 2025 | Book Release

Announcing My New Book: What Really Happened at Nicaea?

For 1700 years, the Council of Nicaea has been surrounded by myths, misunderstandings, and outright fabrications. From claims that Constantine “invented” the Trinity to the idea that the council decided the books of the Bible, there’s no shortage of misinformation floating around. That’s why I’m excited to announce my upcoming book, What Really Happened at Nicaea? This book sets the record straight, taking you inside the actual events of 325 AD—what was debated, what was decided, and why it still matters today. If you’ve ever wondered:✅ Did Constantine rewrite Christianity?✅ Was Jesus’ divinity really up for debate?✅ Did Nicaea create the Bible?✅ What was actually said about Arianism? Then this book is for you. Be the First to Know! What Really Happened at Nicaea? will be available soon, and you can be among the first to hear when it’s released. Head over to lukejwilson.com/what-really-happened-at-nicaea.html and sign up for updates. Let’s cut through the myths and uncover the truth about Nicaea! ...

Heart Soul Mind Strength: The Greatest Commandment

My new book is now available
Order now wherever you get books!

Discover the transformative power of Lectio Divina.
This comprehensive guide invites you on a spiritual journey, enriching your prayer life and deepening your relationship with God through the ancient practice of Lectio Divina.

Order Now

Heart Soul Mind Strength: The Greatest Commandment

Close